Опубліковано мовою оригіналу
Petroleum industry has traditionally been under the magnifying glass of the law enforcement. This business is characterized by natural monopolies, and it also has got money. The reforms have also affected this appetizing slice leaving a trace of notorious searches.
Five searches related to the petroleum business:
Sumy, Okhtyrka, February 2, 2016. The search based on allegations of oil theft was initiated by Okhtyrkanaftogaz as a method to fight the company’s competitors.
Kyiv City Court of Appeals, June 19, 2015. The General Prosecutor’s Office conducted a search at the office of the Court Chairman Anton Chernushenko who had previously issued several decisions in favour of PJSC Naftogazvydobuvannya and revoked the seizure of wells, shares, and accounts. This search marked the beginning of a new trend whereby the judges issuing “wrong” decisions were prosecuted for rendering knowingly unjust judgments. The move is smart and tasteful. Importantly, despite the ongoing criminal proceedings against the judge, the Pechersk Court revoked all seizures of Naftogazvydobuvannya’s property as unlawful. In other words, the court admitted that the judges of the Court of Appeals were correct, as absurd as it sounds.
Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky, BRSM-Nafta, June 25, 2015. The search was originally positioned as a corporate raid since the visitors had no insignia and it was rather difficult to identify them as representatives of the Main Department of the MIA in Kyiv region. The visit was related to a fire at the petroleum storage and distribution facility near Vasylkiv. The State Fiscal Service even mentioned this case when justifying the recommencement of inspections and revocation of the moratorium.
Kremenchug, Kremin-Nafta Ltd, March 20, 2014. The visit followed a complaint from a certain law-abiding citizen alleging that the company was selling low-quality fuel. This peculiar tool for protecting the customer’s rights resulted in a search of the offender. The tax inspection paid a visit and collected fuel samples. Further forensic expertise confirmed the quality of petroleum.
Odesa, Thermal Power Station, August 6, 2015. The SSU arrested the director of Odesa Thermal Power Station on suspicion of terrorism financing and embezzlement of funds. The arrest was followed by searches.
What happens during searches at the oil companies
Visiting without paperwork or documents. How does it look like? People in civilian clothing enter the company’s premises. Sometimes they are assisted by people in uniforms armed with automatic rifles. This is where the shutdown of the enterprise’s operations begins. What can be done? At this stage, it is important to keep them out. For instance, good physical protection is helpful (trained security staff, lack of “blind spots” of surveillance cameras, guarding the entire perimeter). Law enforcement press offices loudly claim that only in exceptional situations a court order authorizing the search is missing or contains errors. In reality, however, these situations are widespread. It is necessary to review the court order and verify whether the document meets the requirements listed in the Criminal Procedure Code.
Denying attorney’s access. How does it look like? The procedure has already started, and the investigating officer does not deem it necessary to let the attorney enter the premises. What can be don? 1. The attorney must be notified immediately after the first signs of upcoming search. The earlier s/he arrives, the more chances there are for the attorney to get in. As to physical access, there are more obstacles to enter these facilities during peaceful times compared to a regular office or residence. It gets even more complicated in the presence of the investigation team. The attorney must be familiar with all points of entry and exit, and every staff member should recognize him/her in person and welcome with open doors when the attorney is rushing to the search. Most importantly, remember that the investigator’s claims are unlawful as s/he can only limit exit, not entry, to the premises. In addition, no one can violate your right to legal aid wherever you are, including a petroleum storage and distribution facility.
Collecting oil samples. What does the process look like? It looks like a part of the procedure called “search”. If the search is based on allegations of terrorism financing, as it was in the case of Poltavagazvydobuvannya, the purpose of collecting samples is to prove that you have been extracting oil on the territories outside of Ukraine’s control or in the Russian Federation. For quite some time, terrorism financing charges are no longer unusual. These charges are added to the mix with the purpose of authorizing the use of force during investigative procedures. What can you do? Recognizing the situation in our country, it is necessary to prepare in advance and perform several unsolicited expert assessments, as well as have the documents confirming origin available.
Expropriating everything. How does it happen? The investigating officer presents a rather wide interpretation and seizes everything s/he deems necessary for the criminal proceedings. What can you do? Obtain and review carefully the court order to understand the scope of court authorization. You can only prevent something from being seized through physical advantage. However, if the seizure record is detailed and contains all the attributes, it is a lot easier for the attorney to have the property returned through court. Take initiative and make a detailed record yourself.
A visit following someone’s complaint remains a good old tradition. How does it look like? After the search is complete, you will definitely be curious about the underlying reasons. These can be found in case files kept with the judge authorizing the search. In most cases, there is a complaint from a mysterious citizen who was taking a stroll nearby and suspected that you were violating the law. What can you do? It might sound ridiculous, but this is a very popular scheme. If you really annoyed someone, this alert citizen might be a parliament member with all resources at his/her disposal. Your security service should follow-up on possible signs as soon as they appear. Do not dismiss seemingly meaningless interviews or ignore incoming requests from the law enforcement bodies. Ignoring them is the first step on the road to a search. A well-written response to the request, along with an elaborate strategy of the company in general, can create miracles in criminal proceedings.
Imposing seizure on wells and fuel. How does it look like? The law enforcement always presents these actions as necessary for the purposes of criminal investigation. What can you do in a situation where the assessment has already been done, but your property remains hostage? What are your actions? The aim of the seizure is always to shut down your operations and force a deal. However, accepting its terms will not help recover your property or receive an ausweis for the future. You need to go to court and have the seizure revoked there. By now, a significant amount of case-law has been developed in these matters.
Violations in the process. How does it look like? Damage of property, attempts to interview staff members, restricting movement around the premises, denying ambulance access… The list depends only on imagination and the skills of the investigator and his/her subordinates. What can be done? It is crucial to prepare the staff for stressful situations, as well as provide security training for them. Your staff members are the resource that could help you win the war. They need to feel that they are a team, support each other, and not leave anyone alone with the law enforcement officers. All violations must be recorded in the comments to the search record. In the future, it might be helpful to file a report about the crimes committed by the investigator
Even state enterprises are not immune to searches. How does it look like? The search at Ukrenerho on October, 6, 2015, was a vivid example. One should note that the search followed several complaints of Anton Gerashchenko who was the first to report about its conduct on his Facebook page. What can you do? Law enforcement officials are very active in using social networks to shape public opinion or put pressure on the courts. Therefore, PR department must constitute an integral part of the company’s security system. It is necessary to work with the media even before the search.
The conclusion is that every victory in court is unique, however, all searches have the same shortcomings in common. There is an objective need to amend the Criminal Procedure Code. We have developed a draft bill that would increase the safeguards for attorney’s access to the premises, introduce stricter requirements in relation to property seizure, as well as ensure that rules are clear and transparent for all players in the game. Yes, a search is also a game, and the toys in this game are quite expensive.